🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to approve a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted laws requiring adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.